Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 7921 - 7940 of 10,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 4:07 am
Plaintiff moved the district court to certify the litigation as a class action; defense attorneys opposed class action treatment on the ground, inter alia, that plaintiff failed to establish the predominance and superiority requirements for a Rule 23(b)(3) class. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:07 pm
Plaintiff moved the district court to certify the litigation as a class action; defense attorneys opposed class action treatment on the ground, _inter alia_, that plaintiff failed to establish the predominance and superiority requirements for a Rule 23(b)(3) class. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:43 pm by Kantor & Kantor LLP
While the health insurer was defending itself in Los Angeles Superior Court for refusing to allow a policyholder to receive a liver transplant at an out-of-state/out-of network hospital because it cost too much, a Los Angeles Times analysis of the company’s regulatory findings revealed that since 2004 Anthem increased it’s parent company’s profitability by $4.2 billion. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:05 pm by Cal Law
He was in trial in Department 119 of Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
Superior Court (Santa Clara County), the Court faced the issue of whether a bankrupt company could maintain an action for trade secret misappropriation when that company had sold its “trade secrets” in connection with the bankruptcy. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:48 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The suit was filed in the Alameda County Superior Court in 2005 by two Pacific Bell employees, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:52 am by Michael Ginsborg
Superior Court denied their motion for a preliminary injunction in the last of three lawsuits related to recognition of same-sex marriages. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
The California Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal’s decision. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:03 pm
Tamco, a California Court of Appeal decision that came out this week, involves an employee of a steel manufacturer who, as he was leaving the premises of the employer to commute home in his own vehicle, collided with a motorcycle police officer, resulting in the officer’s death. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
” Click Here Unilever Fined for Polluting California Air With Deodorant Spray. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:08 am by Moseley Collins
As consistently recognized by California courts, in cases where a motion is supported by facts outside the pleadings, the court may treat the motion as a speaking motion and, therefore, take such evidence into consideration. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
Three sets of considerations, taken together, convince us that this approach, while imperfect, is superior to other possibilities. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:39 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiffs, California citizens, sued Hertz Corporation in a California state court. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:39 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiffs, California citizens, sued Hertz Corporation in a California state court. [read post]