Search for: "U.S. Direct Express" Results 7921 - 7940 of 9,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
It’s can’t be a “direct” tax, since it’s not apportioned by population, as Article I, Section 9 of the constitution requires all direct taxes to be. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm by Lovechilde
" Although HRW expressed no opinion about the ultimate guilt or innocence of any officials under U.S. law, the report provides a narrative summarizing Bush administration policies and practices on detention and interrogation, and details the case for individual criminal responsibility of several key administration officials. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:48 am by Robert A Levy
First, states exercise police power and are not subject to constraints on federal authority in the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:37 am by Ted Frank
Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), that employers can be held liable under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act for neutral personnel practices with a disparate impact on minority workers. [read post]
Campbell) direct a finding of "disabled" for many claimants with exertional impairments who are age 50 or over. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:31 am by Helen Norton
In particular, the prohibition’s sponsors objected strenuously to, and characterized as potentially totalitarian, public speeches and other materials in support of the Administration’s bill by Oscar Ewing, the head of the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
On November 20, 2007, Dienst sent an email to Henkels expressing “amazement and candidly some concern about the recent transaction whereby CIBC divested CIBC World Markets Corp. in the U.S. to Oppenheimer,” and requested “[Henkels's] and Oppenheimer’s assurances that [Henkels] will be there to see this deal across the finish line. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910), a cruel and unusual punishment case. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:49 am by Roger Alford
Rather one must look to the express or implied will of Congress in light of (1) the government interests at stake; (2) the locus of evils to be avoided through regulation; (3) and the appropriateness of asserting jurisdiction in light of considerations of international comity. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:06 pm by Julian Ku
 But is it enough to override an explicit congressional directive? [read post]