Search for: "v. Park" Results 7921 - 7940 of 17,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This evidence convinces the Court of Appeals (Parker, Lee and Park) that defendants were not discriminating against anyone. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Legal Talk Network
  This led to the use of as robot, the Remotec Androx Mark V A-1, manufactured by Northrup Grumman and a pound of C-4 explosive, which was sent in eventually killing the sniper. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 1:04 am by Jon Gelman
Once he became involved and questioned his assistant about the “invested” money, he was attacked at a location that just happened to be their place of employment.Joseph v Monmouth County, DOCKET NO. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case shows us what it's all about.The case is United States v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Since the plaintiff wins this appeal in the Second Circuit the case will continue, though the next step is probably trial.The case is Thompson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:59 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals also finds that plaintiff cannot win her constructive discharge claim, either.The case is Black v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:26 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: EDWIN VINCENT CONKLE v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 2006, for instance, Justice Anthony Kennedy stated as simple fact in eBay v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:01 pm by Jordan Bublick
Last week, the United States Supreme Court granted the writ of certiori in the case of Bullard v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In their recent unpublished, "non-precedential" decision in the case of McLamb v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Upstate New York can be quite beautiful, but the City of Newburgh is no romp in the park. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Accordingly, the Appellate Division said it found no reason to disturb the Board's decision.* Claimant had attributed her "occupationally related disease" to her bus driving duties which required a significant amount of physical effort, "particularly in steering the buses, repeatedly opening and closing the door, and operating the parking brake. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Nealon of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas in the case of Espinosa v. [read post]