Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 7941 - 7960 of 31,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2018, 12:54 pm by Lisa Ouellette
Readers of this blog are likely familiar with the Supreme Court's 2013 FTC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Mid-morning yesterday, the Internet broke shortly after the Supreme Court issued its 5-4 decision in HHS v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case explores some of the wrinkles in the fee-shifting statutes.The case is Chabad Lubavitch of Litchfield County v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As the applicant, [Plaintiff] bore the burden of establishing that his disability was the result of an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law ... [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained the lower courts ruling, explaining that judicial review of an arbitrator's award is extremely limited and the party seeking to vacate an arbitration award "bears a heavy burden[,]' and must establish a ground for vacatur by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:27 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: DEON ALLEN LEONARD v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In addition to requesting a remand under United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision, Petitioner had… [read post]