Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 33,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm
North Dakota, which will affect California’s “implied consent” DUI laws. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm
North Dakota, which will affect California’s “implied consent” DUI laws. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:27 am
Samsung court case that is taking place in California. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:27 am
Samsung court case that is taking place in California. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
(CCP § 338) appeared first on California Partition Law Blog. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
The types that are must be authorized by a California statute. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:15 am
See, e.g., Behr v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
Rath Packing Co. in 1977, it ruled that additional restrictions imposed in California were preempted by federal law. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:40 pm
In a lengthy (70 page) opinion, the California Court of Appeals (Sixth District), in Shaw v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:38 am
In Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 8:35 pm
Erwin Chemerinsky (University of California, Irvine School of Law) has posted Political Ideology and Constitutional Decision-Making: The Coming Example of the Affordable Care Act (Law and Contemporary Problems, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:37 pm
In Los Angeles County v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 12:13 am
In Knabe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:31 am
Co. decision affirms that, under California law, it should not. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:43 am
It is April Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:58 am
Buckhorn v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:20 am
CASE #2 - Arias v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 5:19 am
This discussion group will also address other issues related to reproductive rights, including Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 2:15 pm
Bank v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In 2014, in Burwell v. [read post]
