Search for: "Head v State"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 14,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2016, 1:02 pm
IC 28: golf clubs, golf club heads, golf club shafts, golf club grips, golf bags, golf bag covers, and golf club head covers. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
Monk v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
The first head-scratcher is E.I. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:50 am
United States’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
Several years back, however, in a case that any first-year law student will also know (the mighty United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:22 pm
A: One of the first cases was FTC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
James, I accept, also shook her head. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
As we stated in Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm
Nahum (IP Law Blog) District Court S D New York: Amazon isn’t liable for rogue affiliate’s keyword ad buys: Sellify v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
One of those cases eventually went up to the Supreme Court, and in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:29 am
” State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
Zeppier has had that uncertainty hanging over his head for over a year now, in addition to what must be mounting legal costs. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
District head predicted econ. benefits to recently created district; drawing on recently enacted law saying state holds © over folklore and people’s cultural products—district’s procedures could be “cut from the same cloth” as national law. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:07 pm
That decision was challenged in court, see Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:42 am
My head just exploded . . . [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in the case of Samantar v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:17 am
There is authority for reducing damages under this head to reflect a pre-existing condition: see Zacharas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:26 pm
Therefore in Owens v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 3:42 pm
See, e.g., NXVIM Corp. v. [read post]
