Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 29,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
The court opined that "It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate [its objection] in a court of law," citing Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.* Addressing Facility's contention that it had raised a constitutional challenge alleging that OMIG exceeded its authority and violated Article III, §1, of the New York State… [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 2:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 12:48 pm
Clean Label Project Found. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:28 pm
It should be noted that the debtors in this case had an income level that was twice the amount of the median income for their state. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:59 pm
” The case is Kransky v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 10:39 am
Abbott City of Berkeley v. 1080 Delaware, LLC (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 1144. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Nwauche, A Customary Law of the Afrikaner People of South Africa, (in ES Nwauche (ed) Citizenship and Customary Law in Africa, Centre for African Legal Studies, 69-85 (2020)).John Picton, Lëhtimaki v Cooper: Duty and Jurisdiction in Charity Law, ((2021) 84 Modern Law Review 383).Cindy Lott, Mary Shelly & Nathan Dietz, Regulatory Breadth Index: A New Measurement of State-Level Charity Regulation (November 9, 2020).From SSRN (Religious Law):Fajri… [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 12:17 pm
Last Term, the Supreme Court called for the views of the solicitor general in Loomis v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
State Farm, 78 A.3d 1147 (Pa. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:06 am
Unfortunately, it cited my old case -- United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:14 am
Supreme Court has already ruled in Riley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:30 am
CLS Bank Int'l and its progeny), a patent can be invalidated or an application can be rejected simply by (i) making a high-level analogy between the claimed invention and one that has been previously found to be directed to a patent-ineligible law of nature, natural phenomena, or abstract idea, and (ii) stating in a purely conclusory fashion that the additional elements of the claim are well-understood, conventional, and routine. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:00 am
Guzman v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:36 am
Russo v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
The case of Smiths Group, PLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:17 pm
As the Court held in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
One of EFF's first major legal victories was Bernstein v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:27 am
These include both complete articles and specific paragraphs, indicating varying levels of consensus among the drafters. [read post]