Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 7941 - 7960 of 42,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But that right also covers the right to avoid disclosure of certain personal matters, including medical information. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:04 am by Dean Freeman
That doesn’t necessarily mean plaintiffs in these matters won’t be successful. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Illinois’ DUI Law The Illinois courts have not ruled on an issue similar to the one presented in the California case. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:14 pm by Sandra C. Fava
Plaintiff may have had a good faith basis to seek the re-calculation of defendant’s income, however after the judge made his ruling and absent new or additional evidence, plaintiff should not have filed a motion for reconsideration unless new proofs or information substantiating her claims could be provided. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:05 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Recently, a New York court discussed what evidence a plaintiff must produce to establish the existence of a patient-physician relationship in a matter arising out of alleged ophthalmology malpractice. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:58 am by Grace Yang
With the economic downturn and so many companies looking to reduce HR costs, our China employment lawyers have been seeing a fairly large increase in China employment litigation matters. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:56 am by Dean Freeman
On one hand, it validates employees’ worst fears about coming forward with evidence of nursing home abuse or neglect: That they will be fired. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:26 pm
Specifically, for the exemption to apply, it is incumbent on an employer to offer evidence that the employee's primary duties involve exercising discretion as to "matters of significance," a term of art giving more precise meaning by the non-exclusive list of factors in the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2010, 2:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A claim is obvious if: “the differences be- tween the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 6:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
As to the highest and best use, the Appellate Division found that the only opinion “supported by the evidence” was the Village’s 80-unit development. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court ruled that because the Vanderbilt Structural Features constitute no more than a portion of a claimed compound, the Vanderbilt Scientists cannot, as a matter of law, be joint inventors. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:32 pm by MacIsaac
 In the absence of evidence of irrevocable steps in reliance or undue prejudice, the court should correct the order (para. 27). [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
These matters go to the merits of the custody dispute and are, therefore, beyond the subject matter jurisdiction of the federal courts. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
Thus, Part III of Chief Justice Warren Burger’s opinion for the court focused solely on whether the subpoena was facially valid—an analysis that turned on the three requirements of Rule 17(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, i.e., that the subpoena seek specific, relevant, and admissible evidence from the recipient. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
These matters go to the merits of the custody dispute and are, therefore, beyond the subject matter jurisdiction of the federal courts. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:40 am by Eugene Volokh
When the evidence substantially favors one party’s version of a disputed matter, but an evaluator forms a conclusion in favor of the other side (without an apparent reason based in the evidence), it is plausible to infer (although by no means necessarily correct) that the evaluator has been influenced by bias. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:22 pm by Judicial Watch Blog
Just last month Charles Rangel got a mere slap on the wrist for breaking nearly a dozen House rules, many of which also violate federal laws. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:08 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Approval of Settlements in Birth Injury Cases The court noted that Local Civil Rule 83.2 governed settlements on behalf of infants. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:28 am by Thalia Kruger
This issue includes Court of Cassation cases on contracts, torts and evidence. [read post]