Search for: "B. N. S."
Results 7961 - 7980
of 16,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
S. 398 (1963). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:41 pm
” Notably, “[n]o party ever sought to search the Windrush computers, nor d[id] it appear that any defendant asked for further information about [the vendor’s] forensic review. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:21 pm
On April 20 the employees had eaten food prepared at Bullock’s Bar-B-Que (“Bullock’s”) Restaurant in Durham. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:42 am
Sleepy’s Inc., January 14, 2015, Cuff, M.). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:52 am
§ 1030(c)(2)(B). [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Hoffman's analysis follows along with his translation of the relevant portions of the opinion. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 2:55 pm
by Allison B. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Ensuite, le gouverneur général (dans les faits, l’exécutif fédéral) bénéficie d’un large pouvoir discrétionnaire en matière de nomination des juges des cours visées à l’article 96 de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867, discrétion qui doit cependant s’exercer conformément aux exigences constitutionnelles et légales pertinentes. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm
(d)(1)(B).) [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Under the Analogue Act, if the jury determines that a substance has (a) a chemical structure and (b) a physical effect that are both “s [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Aunque formalmente las nuevas reglas no permiten el turismo básico, están escritas de forma que —algunos expertos han comentado— puede permitirlo indirectamente. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
USCIS et al., Docket Number 13-13554, Decided December 22, 2014 (On Petition for Rehearing-analysis relates to substance of rehearing only); The Eleventh Circuit found that it had jurisdiction to review an agency's final discretionary decision, despite the jurisdiction-stripping provisions found in 8 U.S.C. s 1252(A)(2)(B)(ii), where petitioner alleges that the agency did not follow its own binding regulations in reaching the underlying decision. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:30 pm
§ 102(b) (2006). [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:51 am
“Third party prior use accessible to thepublic is a section 102(b) bar. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
TheCourt emphasized that “[b]ecause of the backward-lookingnature of a legal malpractice claim, the question is posedin a merely hypothetical sense” and that “[n]o matter howthe state courts resolve that hypothetical ‘case within acase,’ it will not change the real-world result of the priorfederal patent litigation. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Department of Agriculture 14-275Issue: (1) Whether the government's “categorical duty” under the Fifth Amendment to pay just compensation when it “physically takes possession of an interest in property,” Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
She delivered the doctor’s note on Homick’s desk on October 26, 2011, and never returned. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:01 am
Los requisitos para este tipo de postulación son: (a) presentar un resumen de no más de 300 palabras sobre el tema a tratar en la ponencia; (b) el tema de la ponencia debe estar relacionado directamente con la experiencia profesional del postulante – la propuesta debe incluir una breve descripción de la experiencia profesional relevante para el tema de la ponencia además del CV del postulante; (c) compromiso de enviar una… [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
Ziegler, supra.The Court of Appeals then explains that [b]ased on the data he received from the SDM, Sergeant Inglett testified that Ziegler's car was traveling at 71 miles per hour five seconds before the crash. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:14 pm
Géorgie du 29 avril 2014 (obs/s. [read post]
