Search for: "Brown v. State"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 8,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2023, 3:47 am
For example, in a 1969 case, Watts v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 6:29 pm
Brown, which concerns whether Maryland may ban semiautomatic rifles that are in common use for lawful purposes, and Ocean State Tactical v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 4:01 am
Hell, Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:26 pm
Id. at 7 (citing Browning v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:02 am
The language of this Court in Brown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 1:18 pm
Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1174 (D.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Brown, Kathryn A. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am
Most recently in 2010, in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:55 am
” On this point, the majority opinion repeatedly referred to Zauderer v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 9:36 am
Russell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
It may well be that the Third Defendant’s “notice and take down” procedure has not operated as rapidly as Mr Browne and his client would wish, but it does not follow as a matter of law that between notification and “take down” the Third Defendant becomes or remains liable as a publisher of the offending material. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am
Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:31 am
Painter (1950) and Brown v. [read post]
