Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2022, 11:00 pm
The case is HAL obo MML v MEC for Health, Free State [2021] ZASCA 149 [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of Texas, Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
As the Statesman-Journal reports, a 2015 Oregon Appeals Court ruling (State v Rabanales-Ramos – 273 Or App 228 (2015)) took a narrow view of the Oregon distracted driving law (ORS 811.507), essentially creating a loophole for all forms of distracted driving other than talking on the phone or texting. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
In Briars v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
In the 2005 California case of Forensis Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:32 pm
Proposed EU information laws on prescription drugs (IPmed) Iceland: Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) in Iceland (The SPC blog) India: Roche implements 'mass serialisation' anti-counterfeiting technology (Spicy IP) Indonesia: Patent application on oil palm hybrids (navigating the patent maze) United States: New PMCA research: State legislative proposals restricting access to generic medicines would increase cost $29 billion over 10 years (GenericsWeb) US:… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:21 pm
Kurz v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 1:16 pm
., State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
The Barket defendants asserted [**3] a cross claim against Hecht for contribution or indemnification. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:53 pm
State Public Works Board. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:53 am
Each week at Wise Law Blog, we review decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.R. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
At the point they are subjected press attention, the children are typically traumatised by the crossing and may also be re-traumatised by being taken captive by border officials (especially where there is a history of state brutality in their countries of origin). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
The order specifically stated that the trial court did not rely on Dr. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm
For example, oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 8:47 am
Additional Resources: U.S. v. [read post]
