Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 22,052
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am
More important to the timing of the effective date of the new rules, the Commission, BRT and Chamber submitted a joint motion [6] to the court on October 8, 2010, requesting expedited consideration of the matter. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:08 am
This article deals with the existing rules, in particular with regard to decisions in administrative matters, and concludes that the current system of enforcement assistance in the enforcement of administrative decisions should be adapted to the existing systems of recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:22 am
., an American lawyer who is an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Warwick in England and who has in interest in confrontation matters, to do a write-up. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:47 am
These are opinions, not court rulings or legislative statutes. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:18 am
All the while, the issues that really matter – privacy, anti-competitive behaviour, online hate, misinformation, a fair share of tech corporate profits – are left largely untouched. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
In turn, the Senate, pursuant to its own impeachment rules (specifically, Senate Impeachment Rule XI), appointed a Senate committee to receive testimony and other evidence and to report to the whole Senate. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
That reasoning is incorrect as a matter of constitutional text and history, and it leads to poor results as a matter of policy for reasons explored at length in a forthcoming article and summarized here. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
As a result of the Court’s decision, the validity of the two-member panel’s rulings and any actions resulting from those rulings are questionable. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:50 am
Motorola, who so vehemently protested the longer schedule advanced by Apple and adopted by the Court, now (without a hint of irony) joins in a request to further extend deadlines. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:50 am
Citing "the complexity of this case and the press of other matters", the parties' lawyers now ask for a 60-day extension of both deadlines. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:50 am
Answering in the negative, the Court reasoned that to hold otherwise would render other provisions of Rule 16 superfluous. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:12 am
Therefore, the court grants Levine’s request for a trial on this matter. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:02 am
Employers may adopt reasonable rules and regulations prohibiting political activities during work hours and/or on the agency’s premises. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
It enacts a statute banning unmarried couples from serving as foster or adoptive parents, thus ruling out a broad class of prospective (and ongoing?) [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
” In our prior posting, we suggested that Inserso seems to advise offerors to adopt a fairly expansive approach in assessing whether the available “law and facts” merit the filing of an early protest. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
It also has no power to initiate proceedings, prosecute matters, or enforce any decisions. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:58 am
The SEC recently announced a settlement with three investment advisor affiliates of The Blackstone Group (the Advisors) that were accused of breaching their fiduciary duty to funds they manage or managed, failing to make necessary disclosure to the funds’ investors and failing to adopt and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and its rules. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:40 am
Soon thereafter, the Center adopted a formal confirmation testing policy. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:26 am
Such a rule, which LG promotes in this appeal, seems to us bad policy, and we decline to adopt it on the Ninth Circuit’s behalf.ANDEven in this appeal, where we agree with Kilpatrick Townsend that the district court committed legal error in its application of privilege doctrine, that is not the same as excusing failure to comply with a judicial order. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:09 pm
Apple disagreed that those were equitable issues, but again, Apple's motion was all about getting additional briefing space on FRAND and properly separating FRAND defenses that have not yet been decided in the first instance from Rule 50 matters on which the parties ask the court to overrule the jury verdict.If Samsung had a strong indefiniteness argument, Judge Koh would have thrown out the relevant Apple patents ahead of trial. [read post]
