Search for: "People, Inc." Results 7961 - 7980 of 23,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2017, 8:12 pm by Kate Howard
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. 16-668 Issue: Whether Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 applies only to physical spaces that people can enter. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm by Laura Mushrush
But instead, it’s dumped into landfills to rot into nothing — enough each year to feed 3 billion people. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Rating: 4/5 Published by Little, Brown and Company, a division of Hachette Book Group Inc., 2012 [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:45 am by Jim Sedor
Connecticut – CT’s Largest Lobbying Firms Led by Women HartfordBusiness.com – Patricia Daddona | Published: 1/9/2017 Paddi LeShane is an equal partner with Patrick Sullivan running Connecticut’s third largest lobbying firm – Sullivan & LeShane Inc. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Donna Ballman’s Screw You Guys, I’m Going Home What the New York Giants Just Taught Us About Handling Office Drama — via Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm by News Desk
Dutch Valley Food Distributors Inc. is recalling 5-pound bags of cappuccino snack mix because of possible contamination with Salmonella in one of its ingredients. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.) that because “the specialty plates bear sufficient indicia of private speech, … a reasonable and fully informed observer would recognize the message on the ‘Choose Life’ specialty plate as the message of a private party, not the state,” and “the messages communicated on specialty plates are private speech, not government speech. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 10:01 pm by Coral Beach
A U.S. company, RGF Environmental Group Inc. of Riviera Beach, FL, announced it would be supplying Chipotle with the equipment from its Palm Beach County production plant. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
In Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. [read post]
Plaintiffs also argued that the intent of the original law was to protect non-smokers from second-hand smoke, but the update to add e-cigarettes changes the purpose of the law to essentially keep people from smoking because e-cigarettes have no negative second-hand impact on non-smokers. [read post]