Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 7961 - 7980 of 39,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2022, 9:19 am
In addition to their sentimental value, people can spend many thousands of dollars on engagement rings and wedding bands; there may understandably be some concern about what happens to wedding and engagement rings in an Illinois divorce when marital property must be divided. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
One law passed two years ago in Texas, referred to by some as the “loser pays” law, may have a significant impact on people’s ability to seek relief for injuries in state and federal court, both by allowing quick dismissal of purportedly “frivolous” lawsuits and by putting plaintiffs at risk of hefty attorney’s fee judgments. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:32 am by Daniel Nazer
EFF, together with the Organization for Transformative Works, has filed an amicus brief in Davis v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:50 am by Eugene Volokh
The Constitution strikes me as a complex document written by complex people for a complex world. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
And for some people, this is the only time their names will ever appear in the paper. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
The scheme is thought to go back to 1988 involving over 1,000 people, many who are former cops and firefighters collecting pensions, who may have bilked the government out of an estimated $400 million. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:19 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Two of the dissenters in Hamdi v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Shireen Smith
  In practice, the third party’s site may already contain website terms of use which grant general permission to link to it. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
In legal briefs, attorneys for Adultland and owner Eric V. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]