Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 7961 - 7980 of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2016, 4:07 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Supreme Court rendered a notable opinion in January 2016. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:34 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Related posts:New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
"As to Hartsdale's representation that only the aggrieved employee could file a grievance, in general, making a decision to file a grievance typically is viewed as vested in the employee organization and not an individual member of the negotiating unit. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 3:59 am
For the reasons that follow, we hold that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard in determining that the children were habitual residents of the United States at the time of the alleged abduction. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Hague cases: A federal district court abused its discretion by deferring to a state court when asked to identify the habitual residence of the children and whether they had been wrongfully removed to the United States from Israel. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
OATH found that Bey and his co-plaintiffs were guilty of all charges filed against them except their alleged "disclaiming of their United States citizenship. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Affinity appealed to thiscourt and the Director of the United States Patent andTrademark Office (Director) intervened. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Eugene Volokh
First, “the public accusations by Van Liew that Stansfield was ‘corrupt and a liar’” were fully protected speech: These remarks about a local public official constituted political speech and were at the core of the speech that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
IFor publication opinions today (4): In United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am by Sean Cornely
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:45 am
  Late last year, for instance, governors from both parties and five states petitioned the EPA to waive the ethanol mandate. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Because a company and its president appealed a District Court's decision without an attorney, the appellate court dismissed the appeal.In United States of America v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm by Amy Howe
United States, a lawsuit challenging the lack of voting representation in the House of Representatives for residents of the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]