Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 7961 - 7980 of 23,982
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
(“GSS”) (D.I. 12); the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency d/b/a American Education Services (“PHEAA”) (D.I. 20); Wilmington Trust Company (“WTC”) (D.I. 31); U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
(“GSS”) (D.I. 12); the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency d/b/a American Education Services (“PHEAA”) (D.I. 20); Wilmington Trust Company (“WTC”) (D.I. 31); U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am by Jonathan R. Siegel
The bigger picture was that “[t]he text is the law, and it is the text that must be observed. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
At the WLF Legal Pulse, Jeffri Kaminski looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:06 pm by Ron Coleman
§ 204, D. 64 at 9, 21 n. 22, applies, the ultimate result here is the same. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 11:00 am by Myers Freelance
You’d have to make some very big mistakes to get penalized. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 10:52 am by Stewart Caton
As I was skimming for cases discussing libel and the TCPA (Texas Citizens Participation Act), I stumbled into D Magazine Partners v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, a constitutional challenge to the federal ban on sports betting, arguing that “[t]he Constitution forbids Congress from ‘commandeering’ the states by compelling them to enact or administer federal policy; it should also be held to forbid Congress from compelling states to continue enforcing past state policy after it has proven ineffective, unpopular, or both. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(See an earlier podcast segment on the topic.)Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Front-end and back-end solutions.Death and TexasUS Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ayestas v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The complaint “is deemed to allege whatever can be implied from its statements by fair and reasonable intendment” (Foley v D’Agostino, 21 AD2d 60, 65 [1964] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]