Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 7961 - 7980 of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2023, 9:55 am by Etienne Farnoux
Sara Tonolo (Università degli Studi di Padova) and deals with Les actes de naissance étrangers devant la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme – à propos de l’affaire Valdís Fjölnisdóttir et autres c/ Islande (Foreign birth certificates before the European Court of Human Rights – about the Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and others v/ Iceland case). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/CASTLETON-BK-SD-IN-LORCH-9-30-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Absent exigent circumstances, stay imposed per Ch 15 is coterminous w/stay in corresponding foreign proceeding. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/DAEWOO-BK-SD-NY-LIFLAND-10-5-11.pdf … B-IA dismisses §548(a)(1)(B) cplt under Twiqbal based on failure to adequate plead insolvency, even if FRCP 9 inapplic.… [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:57 am by John G. Papianou
Evidence establishing the amount is required by § 1446(c)(2)(B) only when the plaintiff contests, or the court questions, the defendant’s allegation. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:16 pm
The grounds for an action for annulmentBMS's action for annulment of the decision was based on  (i) violation of Article 5(12)(b) of the Orphan Regulation in conjunction with the principle of proportionality; (ii)  violation of Article 5(12)(b) in conjunction with Article 5(8); and (iii) failure to identify the legal basis and to state reasons. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:07 am by Andree Blumstein
Or they may petition the state court to construe the states constitution to require removal of the monument. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
That’s because her appointment coincided with USDA’s loss of line speed flexibility for the slaughter of market hogs. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Judges derive insider trading violations from Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (together known as the “SEC’s antifraud provisions”), and are a “catchall” aimed at fraud, requiring some sort of “device, scheme or artifice to defraud” or some action, which would otherwise “operate as a fraud or deceit upon a person. [read post]