Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7961 - 7980 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 12:25 pm by Mona Solouki
(import "generally denotes a product (or perhaps a service) [that] has been brought into the United States from abroad") (quoting Turicentro S.A. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Gavin Newsom of California, who is in the public gallery as he was two years ago for Hollingsworth v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
For example, the California rule just quoted then provides in a comment that “[t]his rule does not prohibit those activities of a particular lawyer that are protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or by Article I, section 2 of the California Constitution. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-7833 Issues: (1) Whether a post-2002 conviction for sale of cocaine or possession of cocaine with intent to sell in violation [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:45 am by Ronald Mann
First is the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in California v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:18 pm
  Pursuant to California Rule of Court 8.548, the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit requested that the California Supreme Court decide whether a plaintiff seeking damages under Civ. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth lets us reach back to discuss the strong decision by Judge Goodwin in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
  The court emphasized that a split in the circuits would be a problem as copyright law is a matter of federal law and is intended to be applied uniformly throughout the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am by Marty Lederman
As my fellow amicus Mike Dorf explains, it appears likely the Supreme Court will rule for California and the House of Representatives in California v. [read post]