Search for: "*/**u.s. v. Lee"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,783
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 11:47 am
Supreme Court held in Atkins v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 3:54 pm
The Bristol paper reported here that Chief Judge Jones is trying to figure out the Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 10:15 am
Lee, 778 F.3d 1341 (Fed. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:14 am
Lee, 16-969 – an important step in the progress toward grant of certiorari. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:59 am
Supreme Court building ahead of our argument in Lee v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:58 am
Lee Bailey v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 7:40 am
Word on the street is that Korematsu v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:00 am
U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
Senator Mike Lee and son of Rex Lee, who had been U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 12:23 pm
Long and U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:53 am
Supreme Courtgranted certiorariin Golan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:07 pm
And MJ Lee and Phil Mattingly of CNN report that “Emails show White House initially planned to nominate anti-abortion Republican to federal judgeship on the day Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:00 am
U.S. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:39 am
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new AIA-trials case: SAS Institute v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:30 am
Texas v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 12:25 am
In Lee v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- In an opinion issued earlier today, the Federal Circuit affirmed a determination by the District Court for the District of Columbia that challenges of patent term adjustment (PTA) determinations by the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
State, 485 U.S. 971 (1988). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:38 pm
The U.S. [read post]
Delayed Restriction Requirement Does Not Result In Patent Term Adjustment For Divisional Application
26 Mar 2014, 10:00 pm
Lee (decided March 19, 2014), the U.S. [read post]