Search for: "//All Plaintiffs//"
Results 61 - 80
of 94,534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 5:39 am
The post All Roads Lead to Dallas: FTC Non-Compete Rule Set to Face Its First Legal Test in the Northern District of Texas appeared first on Truth on the Market. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:28 am
At all. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:30 am
It’s déjà vu all over again. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:05 pm
One limitation of our research design is that it is difficult to identify and control for all of the potential confounding events that might trigger plaintiffs’ attorney investigations in a given month. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Background Plaintiff X Corp. owns and operates the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:44 pm
It demanded that plaintiff cease all sales of his digital art. [read post]
22 May 2024, 2:50 pm
In a lengthy decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery ultimately sided with the plaintiff shareholders. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
Attorney's fees -- Charging lien -- Unjust enrichment -- Venue -- Transfer -- Principle of priority -- Complaint raising multiple claims, including breach of contract, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment, stemming from defendants' failure to distribute settlement proceeds in accordance with charging lien plaintiff law firms had filed in a separate case in a separate county -- Appeal of order dismissing action for improper venue is not moot based on fact that… [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:09 pm
The plaintiffs’ allege that the defendants began their scheme when Mo and Dai induced Fang to spin off a valuable and profitable subsidiary, China Index Holdings Limited (CIH). [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:44 am
” (The court interpreted this as meaning all users physically located in Australia.) [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:00 am
” The Plaintiffs responded by arguing that if there are no other independent grounds for federal jurisdiction, no independent federal jurisdiction exists in a removed case once all federal questions are dismissed, such that “any jurisdiction that continues over the remaining state-law claims is supplemental jurisdiction. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
When evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the question becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not eventuate (see Guggenheimer v… [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
When evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the question becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not eventuate (see Guggenheimer v… [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:00 am
MEANINGFUL REVIEW COULDN’T BE PERFORMED ABSENT ALL DOCUMENTSIn a personal-injury lawsuit filed with the Kings County Supreme Court, the defendant made multiple motions “to stay the action, vacate the note of issue, and compel discovery. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:10 am
" Plaintiffs submitted two ads that promoted the idea that the nation's founders were Christians. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:36 pm
The District Court ruled against the Amish plaintiffs in Miller v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:21 pm
Before founding LexBlog, O’Keefe was a trial lawyer in rural Wisconsin for 17 years, representing plaintiffs in various cases. [read post]
21 May 2024, 3:08 pm
Stories of individuals, plaintiff or defense, are also fairly easy to summon. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:16 pm
Unless an employer chooses to pay all employees doing the same work exactly the same, there will always be at least one employee who makes less for the same work than another employee of the opposite sex (or other protected group). [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:27 pm
The plaintiff alleged that this practice violated Sections 631(a) and 632.7 of CIPA. [read post]
