Search for: "3 NY3d 1" Results 61 - 80 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2010, 10:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
Apparently New York expects its judges to recall the judgment of King Solomon (1 Kings 3:16-28) in determining the voluntariness of a plea.Excellent work by Mr. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:40 am
The hoist mechanism proved inadequate to shield plaintiff from the harm directly flowing from the application of the force of gravity and thus summary judgment on plaintiff's section 240(1) claim was properly granted (see Runner v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 13 NY3d 599, 604 [2009]; Williams v 520 Madison Partnership, 38 AD3d 464 [2007]). [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 8:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
  The Court of Appeals has held that section 8-107(13)(b)(1) of the Administrative Code holds corporate employers strictly liable for the discriminatory acts of their managers and supervisors (see Zakrzewska, 14 NY3d at 469). [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 3:14 am
People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288 [2006]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]; People v Gonzalez, 1 NY3d 464 [2004], People v Hafeez, 100 NY2d 253 [2003]; see also Policano v Herbert, 430 F3d 82 [2d Cir 2005], questions certified to the N.Y. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:27 pm
., 23 Misc 3d 1137(A)In this case the court considered the application of the so-called "Felix" procedure [Felix v New York City Dep't of Citywide Administrative Services, 3 NY3d 498] in a situation where the incumbent loses or fails to renew a license required to perform the duties of the position or otherwise fails to satisfy a job qualification.Felix involved the termination of an employee without a “pre-removal hearing” in the nature of disciplinary… [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
It is the function of the administrative agency, not the reviewing court, to weigh the evidence, assess the credibility of witnesses, and determine which testimony to accept and which to reject.3. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining if there is a special relationship between a municipal employer and a municipal employee2015 NY Slip Op 00526, Appellate Division, Second Department Sometimes there is a "special relationship" between a municipal employer and a municipal employee.Citing Pelaez v Seide, 2 NY3d 186, the Appellate Division explained that a special relationship of a municipality to an individual can be formed in three ways: (1) when the municipality violates a statutory duty… [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Inc., 8 NY3d 478.Member also contended that the CBO had breached its duty of fair representation when it refused to provide her with counsel to defend herself in an action brought by her former employer to recover an alleged salary overpayment. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Article 75 of the CPLR provides that an arbitration award may be vacated if the court finds that the rights of a party were prejudiced by (1) corruption, fraud, or misconduct in procuring the award; (2) partiality of an arbitrator; (3) the arbitrator exceeded his or her power; or (4) the arbitrator failed to follow the procedures mandated by Article 75. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, in a 3 to 2 decision, affirmed the Supreme Court's action and judgment, explaining: 1. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, in a 3 to 2 decision, affirmed the Supreme Court's action and judgment, explaining: 1. [read post]