Search for: "A v. X, Y, and Z"
Results 61 - 80
of 298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
They have bееn gіvеn аuthоrіzаtіоn beyond thе аvеrаgе collection аgеnсу аnd tаkе tаx dеbt соllесtіоn vеrу seriously. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:01 pm
That means that X (or someone claiming through X), who was allegedly injured by Y, cannot sue Z, who is Y’s liability insurer.Well, now it appears that there may be an exception – if the injured person also happens to be a Medicare beneficiary. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm
X is for the X on online ballots, which were used in several municipal elections in 2010. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 am
More typically, Y tries to take advantage of X's negative behavioral covenants by claiming to be a third party beneficiary of the Z-X contract, but those arguments rarely work, and the plaintiffs don't try them here. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:31 am
Enmendar la legislación electoral para prohibir los donativos en efectivo. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:49 pm
., letting all the plaintiffs injured in X way or deceived in Y fashion go to trial together, an putting the W and/or Z plaintiffs on a different track? [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
In ordering their extraction, DJ Evans acknowledged the impact on the children: “The worst case presented to me is that Z would be put up for adoption and X and Y would be fostered, but that might not necessarily mean keeping them together . . . [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
In оthеr wоrdѕ, іf уоu оwе mоnеу tо thе IRS, thеу can uѕе thе power оf a tаx lеvу tо gеt іt back by ѕеіzіng your property. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 9:28 am
Keyboard shortcuts have been invaluable Here are some of my favorites (and work pretty much anywhere, not just Word): Copy: Control-C (Win), Command-C (Mac)Paste: Control-V (Win), Command-V (Mac)Cut: Control-X (Win), Command-X (Mac)Select All: Control-A (Win), Command-A (Mac)Undo: Control-Z (Win), Command-Z (Mac)Redo: Control-Y (Win), Command-Y (Mac)Save: Control-S (Win), Command-S (Mac)Find: Control-F… [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:41 am
Supreme CourtAdams, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18 (11 May 2011)Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 & Anor [2011] UKSC 19 (11 May 2011)Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)Zejmowicz & Anor, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1173 (11 May 2011) Nicholas & Anor v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1175 (11 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)Mahan Air & Anor v Blue Sky One Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 544 (11… [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Yоu can simply рау оff thе outstanding tаx b
[read post]
11 Oct 2012, 2:27 pm
So if your client receives an upward variance and the transcript does not contain the sentence “I am varying upward because of X, Y, and Z,” a procedural reasonableness appeal may be an option. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:35 am
Que venga alguien y me dijera: desde 2005 se están realizando juicios populares en Córdoba, se han realizado un número n de juicios, con resultado condenatorio en el x % de los casos. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
’The format is tremendously flexible though, and claims like this are possible:‘Use of drug X in the manufacture of a medicament for preventing disease Y in an individual with gene Z that leads to susceptibility to disease Y, wherein drug X is administered by a device implanted in the arm of the individual which simultaneously delivers an electric current to the surrounding tissues. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:03 pm
Today, the International Court of Justice concluded its public hearings in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:24 pm
In 1993, in Sale v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
Or maybe, in (B), Doug's Widgets sells the widgets to X, Y, and Z on credit, but then Doug's goes bankrupt.If there's legally an agreement, then presumably in (A), I can sue eBay for screwing up the sale, and in (B), Acme Manufacturing can sue X, Y, and Z for the purchase price of the widgets, right? [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:12 am
Bоnus vəsаitlərini gеri qаzаnmаq lаzım оlmаyасаq, çünki оnlаr təmin еdilmir. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:17 am
The applicant typicallyelects a species (e.g., widget + X), focuses on prosecutingthe generic claims to the widget and any claims to thewidget + X species, and withdraws the claims to the nonelectedspecies, widget + Y and widget + Z. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
The claim is unlikely to define a single mixture, but, either because x y and z are defined with ranges, or because other conditions v and w also affect the outcome but are not specified, a number of mixtures are possible that fall within the scope of the claims.The Anon went on to say“Said mixture not being characterisable by techniques in common practice today, but identifiable by a 3rd party using their new fangled gadget, such that they are able to… [read post]
