Search for: "A. S. v. Department of Public Welfare (Majority Opinion)"
Results 61 - 80
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
In Haaland v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:57 am
In his 1947 opinion for the court in Everson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
She rejects the goal of maximizing consumer welfare, which the Justice Department and the FTC have pursued for the last 50 years. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
Opinion Editor’s note: Following is a letter sent to the USDA’s deputy undersecretary for food safety regarding a petition filed by several consumer groups and individuals who are asking the government to declare certain types of Salmonella illegal in meat and poultry. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 7:37 am
Telecom v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Garland has spent most of his career in public service, much like Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:58 pm
Here's an excerpt from the opinion, NRA v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito yesterday called the leak of his draft opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
It is therefore important to adopt measures to protect the general welfare and the interest of the collectivity as a whole under the concept of public order (ordre public). [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
But he will leave behind a legacy of opinions that will continue to remind current justices and the public of the paramount need to maintain a government that works to promote the public welfare. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
Although public officials are free to express their opinions and may condemn viewpoints or groups they view as inimical to public welfare, they cannot abuse their regulatory authority to retaliate against disfavored advocacy organizations and to impose burdens on those organizations' ability to conduct lawful business. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
According to the opinions of Justices in the majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Will so-called “inferior” courts, let alone the mass public, be able cogently to “interpret” the majority’s declaration of law, especially given Justice Kavanaugh’s apparent eagerness to portray Thomas’s opinion as less radical than most readers believe it to be. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
The Court’s opinion was explicitly direct, and its ruling simple. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
For example, the cities of Aspen and Boulder and the city and County of Denver each had enacted ordinances which banned discrimination in many transactions and activities, including housing, employment, education, public accommodations, and health and welfare services. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
” You can read the opinion here. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:38 pm
Adding to the issue is the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
The background for this decision is as follows: In 1977’s Abood v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
In our hypothetical, a well-connected constituent of a member of Congress had been indicted by the Department of Justice. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm
It may be assumed that today’s Supreme Court (which has deemed consumer welfare to be the lodestone of antitrust enforcement since Reiter v. [read post]
