Search for: "AGENT v. AGENT" Results 61 - 80 of 18,680
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 5, 2024, a jury in California federal court found a former corporate executive liable for insider trading in SEC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:51 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  Apparently, the expression has its origins from an 1870 trial in Missouri, Burden v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
This autocracy threat tracker is also available as a PDF file. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Court of Chancery recently examined such an agreement in In West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am by Michael Oykhman
The actus reus for a lottery offence under s. 207.1 is established by proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the following: The accused did not, as the owner, operator, or agent, of an international cruise ship, did not comply with all of the conditions required by s. 207.1 to lawfully conduct or operate a lottery scheme during a trip on the cruise ship; OR The accused did not, as a person participating in a lottery scheme, follow all of the conditions required by s. 207.1. [read post]