Search for: "ANDREWS v. AC" Results 61 - 80 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Another preview comes from Andrew Maury and Nicholas Halliburton for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS, Sasha Samberg-Champion discusses Fry v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm by Elina Saxena
” According to the newswire, the crew of the AC-130 gunship was given the coordinates for an Afghan intelligence building where Afghan forces were said to be in danger, but the coordinates pointed the plane to an open field near the hospital. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:22 am by Amy Knight, Arden Chambers
The House of Lords considered the effect of s 17(1) in Din (Taj) v Wandsworth LBC [1983] 1 AC 657, HL. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
 Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
  Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
*****  PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH  | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on… [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:42 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Further, section 21(1)(a) only applies in cases of fraud or fraudulent breach of trust, and since it is clear after Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378 that knowing assisters are liable on the basis of their own dishonesty, it would be irrational to provide or withhold protection of the limitation to a third party on the basis of the honesty, or otherwise of the trustee. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
” Notes of Testimony of Andrew Willan at 26 (April , 2010). [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
  A statement of the principle was set out in the case of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 8:46 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
In so arguing, Miller and Truog join a long line of academic criticism of the law that extends back to the seminal decision of Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 (HL) and beyond. [read post]