Search for: "Allstate Insurance Co. v. Law" Results 61 - 80 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2010, 3:23 pm by msW1Ld
Allstate Insurance Co., No. 08-1008, 2010 WL 1222272 (Mar. 31, 2010), the Court held that Rule 23 trumps NY CPLR 901(b), which prohibits class actions under New York statutes authorizing a claim for statutory or multiple damages. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:02 am by JT
Co. v Nalbandian, 2011 NY Slip Op 07785 (2d Dept. 2011) “The plaintiff was entitled to commence this action to compel the de novo adjudication of the insurance dispute at issue since a master arbitrator’s award in favor of the defendant exceeded the statutory threshold sum of $5,000 (see Insurance Law [...] [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Joy Waltemath
Below, the Ninth Circuit concluded in Jimenez v Allstate Insurance Co that a district court did not abuse its discretion in applying Rule 23’s commonality requirement because the common questions it identified would drive answers to the elements of an off-the-clock claim under California law. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:09 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
”If a husband and wife, or both, are named in the policy, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:25 pm
  So this is one of those rare instances where California law, rather than leading the pack, radically lags behind it. [read post]