Search for: "Amaral"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
As Vikram David Amar has pointed out in these pages, the Incompatibility Clause (Art. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
We don’t think there is a convincing answer to that question, which is one straightforward reason why we would be extremely surprised if this lawsuit ending up having any real legs.Follow @prof_amar Vikram David Amar is a Distinguished Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law and a Professor of Law and Former De [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
[1] My fellow Balkinization blogger Mark Tushnet has suggested, and amici Akhil and Vik Amar have argued, that the Court should opt for a fourth option—namely, to affirm the legality of Colorado’s refusal to place Trump’s name on the primary election ballot without deciding the substantive question of his eligibility to be President. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Akhil Amar has returned to this theme in his books. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:53 am
In late December, University of Illinois standout basketball player Terrence Shannon Jr. was arrested by Kansas officials for alleged digital penetration of a woman’s vagina without her consent at a bar in Lawrence, Kansas, back in September. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Say what you will about Donald Trump, he is a prodigious generator of constitutional law. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:18 pm
The Amar brothers think a Democratic President of the Senate and a Democratic majority in the House are not bound by the Republican Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:04 pm
The post The Amars Have Done it Again appeared first on Discourse.net. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:42 am
Akhil and Vik Amar have filed an eye-popping and game-changing brief in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
[A new source in the debate over Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.] [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Just before Christmas, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued an important ruling that invalidated the district lines (enacted by state legislators and the governor) that had been in use for elections for state legislative elections. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Immediately prior to taking the position at Illinois in 2015, Amar served as the Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a Professor of Law at the UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Immediately prior to taking the position at Illinois in 2015, Amar served as the Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a Professor of Law at the UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 7:42 am
For Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, I would instead encourage everyone to listen to the four podcasts that Akhil Amar and Andy Lipka have recorded on that subject. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am
I cannot improve on Professor Vikram Amar's Verdict column explaining the meaning of direct and indirect taxes, but the point of the 16th Amendment was to say that even though the Court was wrong, the income tax is no longer subject to its misguided holding: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
También Días de Verano, de Amaral y Nunca quise, de Intoxicados. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 11:48 am
That is wrong for the reasons I spelled out in my post on the Volokh Conspiracy last night responding to Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram Amar. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
The Amar brothers claim that the only things that are direct taxes are capitation (head) taxes and land taxes. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:34 am
Professors Akhil and Vikram Amar argue that only two taxes qualify as direct: capitations and land taxes. [read post]
