Search for: "American Independent Party v. Austin"
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am
This doctrine was used by the Roberts Court majority to strike down the ban on independent expenditures by corporations, which the Court previously had upheld in Austin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:03 pm
University of Texas at Austin, permanently enjoined the enforcement of Obama administration immigration policies in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
-PH Strategic Dialogue, Washington and Manila announced a deal allowing for a rotating American military presence at five Philippine bases. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 6:04 am
The style of the case is, Evridges, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
I want to reiterate my call to think of consumers and not the consumer—the plurality/bell curve concept is logically independent of the idea of treating consumers differently in different contexts, but I think that conceiving of consumers in the plural more easily allows us to adjust to different contexts, such as the nuclear reactor not run by Homer Simpson. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Independent surveyor is interesting idea. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
Austin), and many subjects settled in South Texas on the lands granted to them. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The fourth assumption identified in the Manual is that the exposure under study acts independently of other exposures. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Fox v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Kan. 2002) (excluding, with aid of independent, court-appointed expert witnesses, a party expert witness, David Healy, who failed to reconcile the fact that other research is contrary to his conclusion), aff’d, 356 F.3d 1326 (10th Cir.), cert denied, 125 S. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
The McCutcheon plurality’s cavalier approach to stare decisis, and the willingness of five Justices in Citizens United to overrule both Austin v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm
EME Homer City Generation and American Lung Association v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Barack (4) Bill Wineke (4) billo (1) Billy Joel (2) bin Laden (130) Bird Dog (1) birds (204) birth control (69) birthday (48) bisexuality (9) Bissage (47) bitter Americans (44) BJM (1) Bjørn Lomborg (3) blackness (1) Blagojevich (50) Blagosmear on Obama (4) Blake (the commenter) (5) Blake Gopnik (1) Blanche Lincoln (1) BLDGBLOG (6) blindness (15) blog commenting (42) BlogAds (4) Blogd [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:51 pm
Just four years ago, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am
Circuit’s unanimous en banc opinion in SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:26 pm
This approach is consistent with Eighth Circuit precedent in the context of class arbitrations, Dominium Austin Partners, L.L.C. v. [read post]
