Search for: "Andrews v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 5,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
It begins with Andrew Dickinson’s meticulous analysis of the meaning of “damage” in EU private international law. [read post]
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
IP may have centred on rights of individuals, but its ownership and teaching is likely to become ever more collaborative and collective.The editors state the need for sharing best practice as a key driver for this book. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Brown, by Andrew CoanThe ongoing debate over the Dobbs majority’s attempt to claim the mantle of Brown v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jill Lepore Oliver Wendell Holmes was born in 1841, when Andrew Jackson was president. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:33 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
What is the state of affairs in other member states which have signed but not ratified the UPCA? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
Andrew Johnson declared he was the "chief executive officer of the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there will be a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:20 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Andrews has services every Sunday at 11 am at the church on 8th street between U and V streets in Sacramento. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action was correct. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
On this reading one then understands that the opt-out in Article 83(3) relates only, as it explicitly states, to the “exclusive jurisdiction” of The Unified Patent Court. [read post]