Search for: "Application of Andrews" Results 61 - 80 of 4,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 4:53 am by jonathanturley
.'” Judge Andrew Oldham dissented and argued that “The people of Texas are entitled to the benefit of state law right up to the point where any particular application of it offends the Supremacy Clause. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm by Ilya Somin
Judge Andrew Oldham filed a lengthy dissenting opinion, most of it devoted to the preemption issues, and to the argument that SB 4 might be legal in at least some applications. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The claim concerns a tweet published by Matthew Hancock MP last January which accused the claimant, Andrew Bridgen MP, of promoting an anti-Semitic, anti-vax theory. [read post]
According to the Ranking of Resident Applicants published by the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (BRPTO), Stellantis filed 58 patent applications, ranking third overall in the national ranking[2]. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Saba Mengesha
Andrews in an article for the European Journal of Political Theory. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Unlike in the US system, Ontario also allows certain matters to be commenced by various ‘flavors’ of Application. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 2:49 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
An expert was appointed, and a representative of the applicant was authorized to attend the seizure. [read post]
The SPC relied on Chinese law provisions to establish the FRAND rate, drawing from Articles 41 and 49 of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Application of Law in Foreign-related Civil Relations. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:10 am by Robert Brammer
H.R.7521 [118th] Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act 7. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:00 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
It should be remembered that, in accordance with article 60.1 of the UPCA, the applicant must provide reasonably accessible evidence, in line with directive 2004/48 (art. 7). [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
However, the rules of procedure (rule 194.5) provide that the applicant may withdraw his application without the defendant being informed if the ex-parte application is unsuccessful. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
However, the rules of procedure (rule 194.5) provide that the applicant may withdraw his application without the defendant being informed if the ex-parte application is unsuccessful. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:31 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  The patents and patent applications in suit relate to aspects of a synthetic DNA vector called doggybone DNA or dbDNA and its enzymatic production. [read post]
Once again, this effect is not supported by any data in the application as filed, and nor is it expressly identified. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A version of this article previously was published as a Hunton Andrews Kurth client alert (here). [read post]