Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability, et al, et al" Results 61 - 80 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am by Joe Consumer
Studies of medical error consistently find that the vast majority of patients injured by medical error do not file a claim (Weiler et al. 1993; Sloan et al. 1995; Andrews, 2006). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:12 pm
Statutory and Hawaii Direct Action Settlement Counsel et al, U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
ET AL. handed down on Wednesday, February 29th, 2012 will PUT ON THE BRAKES for railroad workers, who contracted an asbestos related disease, from seeking justice in the courthouse against manufacturers of harmful asbestos containing products. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:11 pm by David Oliver
Railroad Friction Products Corp., et al. felt bound by stare decisis (in this case Napier) to hold that the petitioners' design defect claims against the manufacturers of asbestos-containing friction products used in locomotives were preempted by the Locomotive Inspection Act (LIA). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:50 am by Michelle Yeary
  For the record – What is MDL 875--Asbestos Products Litigation? [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Del. 2006) (requiring showing of relative risk greater than two to support property damage claims based on unreasonable risks from asbestos insulation products). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm by Chris Martin
  Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al vs Frank's Casing, 246 S.W. 42 (Tex. 2008). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
Talcott, et al., “Asbestos-associated Diseases in a Cohort of Cigarette-Filter Workers,” 321 N.Engl.J.Med. 1220 (1989). [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by William A. Ruskin
Barnstead International et al. (2010 NY Slip Op. 30819)  In that case, Kentile Floors, Inc. [read post]