Search for: "At & T COMMUNICATIONS v. Marks"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
On Tuesday the Court will hear oral arguments in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 12:59 pm
Gravelle v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:11 am
After all, media releases are usually reserved for decisions of the General Court's superior chamber, the Court of Justice -- and there are hundreds of General Court decisions each year in Community trade mark appeals (the previous General Court ruling to receive the same treatment was Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM nearly two months ago). [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
In short, from now on, when two registered Spanish trade marks coexist, the holder of the earlier trade mark no longer has to seek the nullity or invalidity of the later trade mark before seeking to forbid its use.Traditional doctrineHistorically, Spanish doctrine has considered that the owner of a registered Spanish trade mark had a right to use the trade mark, which didn’t yield even to the ius prohibendi of an earlier-registered Spanish… [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 5:43 am
Christoph Bartos, member of the Boards of Appeals at OHIM, provided an overview of the revision of the Community Trade Mark (soon EU Trade Mark), which he considers a minor update that should not cause great disruptions. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
The IPKat says, watch out for Case C-108/07 Ferrero Deutschland v OHIM and Cornu - but don't hold your breath: it can take the best part of two years to get a result.Left: Ferro-actinolite. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
Perhaps I should write "extra-high performance".The first two are Community or now EU trade marks, and the third an International designating the EU, so the legislation which was engaged in the case was Council Regulation (EC) No. 207/2009. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
The power of a Community collective mark, when contrasted with a protected geographical indication, was put to the test on 2 October, in Cases T-624/13 (noted here), T-625/13, 626/13 and 627/13 The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Delta Lingerie Intervening, when the Eighth Chamber of the General Court of the European Union gave its decision on a series of separate Community… [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:42 am
Cases T‑604/11 and T‑292/12 Mega Brands International v OHIM is a decision of the EU General Court concerning two sets of opposition proceedings brought by Diset SA against two Community trade mark applications of Mega Brands (creator of Mega Bloks, the long-time Lego rival) based on a Spanish national registration. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:04 pm
London Taxi The London Taxi Corporation Ltd (t/a The London Taxi Company) v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd and another [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch), 20 January 2016 In the first High Court Decision, Mr. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:04 pm
London Taxi The London Taxi Corporation Ltd (t/a The London Taxi Company) v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd and another [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch), 20 January 2016 In the first High Court Decision, Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
In May 2003 Audi and Volkswagen applied to register as a Community trade mark the word sign TDI, for ‘vehicles and constructive parts thereof’ (Class 12). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm
NSA, our longstanding case on behalf of AT&T customers aimed at ending the NSA’s dragnet surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans’ communications. [read post]
The BASMATI saga: General Court accommodates extended passing off within Community trade mark system
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
Earlier this week Katfriend Nigel Urwin (Lee Bolton Monier-Williams) brought to the IPKat's attention news of a case (Tilda Riceland Private v OHMI - Siam Grains (BASMALI), T-136/14) that the General Court (GC) decided on 30 September last, and appears to have some relevant implications particularly as far as that peculiar creature of UK common law known as extended passing off is concerned.Before going into the details of the decision, what is extended passing off? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
All sorts of things have been occupying this Kat's attention for the past few weeks so he hasn't been able to bring you any thoughts or comments about some of the more interesting Community trade mark (CTM) cases that have come from the EU's General Court. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 3:06 am
March 26, 2019 - 1 PM: Branded, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Two US academics, Eric Goldman and Jeff Kosseff, have put together an interesting collection of articles on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and, to mark the twentieth anniversary of the pivotal decision in Zeran v AOL – which they describe as “internet law’s most important decision“. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
Bennett (echoing the pre-CU decision in FEC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:32 am
Some of you certainly remember the Google v Vuitton case decided by the CJEU some years ago now, in 2010, which was a case about trade mark infringement. [read post]
