Search for: "B-G "
Results 61 - 80
of 12,462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm
Background Gregory B. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Thanks to Brendan B. for spotting this. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 8:35 am
In 2020, the FCC approved Cumulus’ petition to exceed the 25% limit on foreign investment set out in Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act – provided that Cumulus would in the future request specific approval for any new foreign investor proposing to hold more than a 5% voting or equity interest. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court's Dobbs Abortion Decision: a Bitter Pill to Swallow, (Drake Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 1, 2024).Reva B. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) — détermination de la peine — infractions contre la personne — voies de fait — victimes travailleuses du sexe — 2 victimes âgées de 18 ans — accusé âgé de 28 ans — antécédents judiciaires — risque élevé de récidive — délinquant dangereux — détention — durée indéterminée… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
[Questions from Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch revisit unresolved issues from 2017-2020.] [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:50 pm
Résumé de la décision : Selon la Cour suprême, l’Association des cadres de la Société des casinos du Québec (l’ Association) n’a pas démontré, lorsqu’on applique le test à deux volets énoncé dans l’arrêt Dunmore[2], que l’exclusion législative des cadres de premier niveau du régime général des rapports collectifs de travail au… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 7:54 am
The FTC interprets § 6(g) as the source of its rulemaking authority. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:37 am
(b) Existing causes of action. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Feb. 9, 2024), the Court of Chancery addressed whether a board properly approved a merger agreement under Section 251(b) where the board did not approve the final, execution version of that agreement. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
§ 1.263(a)-4(b)(1)(v) [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
IV, § 2(B)(1)(g). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:06 am
The corollary question concern whether the position is different where an appeal is filed before the application is withdrawn - in which case Article 139(2)(b) EUTMR is not triggered and the conversion process can proceed. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
(G. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:27 am
El primer ejemplo caótico fue el nuevo régimen de las costas (que ha generado dispersión de la que se ha hecho eco con magnífico análisis por Diego Gómez) y el segundo ejemplo es este relativo a la queja…¿Quousque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra? [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
B. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:56 pm
G. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:10 am
This originates from the Grand Board decision in ‘OPTIMA’ (R 331/2006-G of 27/09/2006). [read post]
