Search for: "BAKER v. U.S. HOUSING AUTHORITY"
Results 61 - 80
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am
Lucia Radder analyzed a House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee hearing on U.S. management of COVID-19. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
So today my remarks will focus on war powers—specifically the president’s ability to commit the U.S. armed forces into some level of hostilities without congressional authorization. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am
” He authored 614 majority opinions, and 146 dissenting opinions during his time on the bench. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm
Hadley Baker shared the House managers’ reply to the Trump brief. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
On the Friday before the election, U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 5 November 2019 Steyn J handed down judgment in the case of Hemming v Baker [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
We went back to the historical review of presidential impeachments written by Jon Meacham, Timothy Naftali, Peter Baker and Jeffrey Engel. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am
Hadley Baker shared a proposed bill from Repbulican Sen. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Sayoc as well,” said U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
Sentencing Guidelines to Justify Limiting the Impact of Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
” Watkins v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am
Peter Margulies analyzed the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm
A spokesman for the U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Vishnu Kannan shared House Judiciary Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings’ letter to the U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
” Most of it strikes me as basically a restatement of Frankfurter’s anguished dissent in Baker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In this connection, think back to 2018’s Colorado same-sex-wedding baker case; there the Court ruled in favor of the baker not because he necessarily had an entitlement to be free from Colorado’s antidiscrimination law, but because the Colorado authorities harbored a religious bias against him as they enforced state law. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Tiye Foley, Michael Ritter, and Ryan V. [read post]
