Search for: "BARES V. STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 3,610
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am by Michael C. Dorf
And to do that, the post-Chevron cases say, the court does not simply ask whether the bare statutory language has a gap or an ambiguity. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
 In post-1997 companies, the BCL expressly states that a shareholder does not have preemptive rights unless they are provided for in the corporation’s certificate of incorporation. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
The court made a big show of recounting the applicable precedent, but then only barely engaged with the binding precedent. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:11 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court’s Decision Before it could determine the substantive outcome of the case, the Seventh Circuit had to address standing, stating that a concrete injury must be more than a bare claim that a statutory violation occurred. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am by George Croner
Those who coined the term “backdoor search” point to a 2019 decision (pp. 68-79), United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
Although the legal history of boycotts in America is complex, boycotts have widely been considered protected speech since NAACP v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:54 am by Jocelyn Bosse
 This time, the competing views were laid bare in the recent judgment of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco v Australian Grape and Wine Incorporated [2023] SGCA 37. [read post]