Search for: "BARNETT v. BARNETT"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,949
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2019 Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
The panel declared that AR-15s are not protected by the Second Amendment in overturning the preliminary injunction win Barnett v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
The reply brief addresses only a single one of the amici briefs, namely the one that I coauthored; the amici included the VC's Randy Barnett. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 7:55 am
Barnette (1943), the Pledge of Allegiance case. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:51 pm
Walker in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Barnett and Lawrence B. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 6:11 am
As part of the symposium, Kent Barnett and I will be contributing an essay, entitled Chevron and Stare Decisis, which is based on the amici curiae brief we filed in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
[Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case] This week amicus briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 7:18 am
” The hubbub over drilling in municipalities arose after companies developed the technology to tap the Barnett Shale, which underlies the cities of Dallas and Fort Worth, as well as Denton. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
IPSO 19756-23 Saunders v mirror.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19679-23 Saunders v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement 18579-23 Reynolds v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediated 18539-23 Garnier v Tenbury Wells Advertiser, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigatio 17700-23… [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 12:24 pm
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:31 pm
(NA)In addition to Devillier v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:59 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 524, 538 (1943)). [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
It is theoretically possible that the SCOTUS could draw nourishment from Ottawa to fatten up Chevron step two, in the same way that Justice Kagan rescued Auer deference from the hangman’s noose by giving it a highly contextual and reasoned structure in Kisor v Wilkie (see also the discussion of Chevron’s footnote 11 in the amicus brief of Professors Barnett and Walker). [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 11:26 am
Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:14 pm
Walker in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Despite vast scholarship by heavy hitters like Bernard Siegan and Randy Barnett and decades of public interest litigation with sympathetic facts, the Supreme Court refuses to consider the right to earn a living a “fundamental” right protected by the Due Process Clause. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
Gobitis in 1940 only to reverse itself just a few years later in Barnette has been oft-told. [read post]
