Search for: "BM v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2014, 1:09 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:01 am
In Mauvais v Herissee, 2014 WL 1454452 (D.Mass.)) the district court granted the petition of Manel Mauvais for the return of his two minor children to Canada. [read post]
1 May 2014, 1:29 am
Wilson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:16 am
(But see Robb v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Overview Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a spore-forming, gram-positive anaerobic bacillus that produces two toxins: toxin A and toxin B. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:26 am
If, in response, to BMS's request regarding its launch plans Teva disclosed its actual state of mind then the judge considered it would have said that "it had no plans to launch efavirnez before expiry but was actively considering the option of doing so". [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
In the decision of 9 July 2013 in BMS v Teva [2013] EWHC 1958, Mr Justice Birss assumed the role of the "remember when you..." parent in respect of Teva's launch plans. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
The invalidation may have some serious repercussions on the ongoing Indian case ( BMS v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:43 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
If Condition 5 is the only of the BMS conditions not fulfilled, where is the prejudice? [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
Under Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova condition ("the BMS conditions"), Condition 5 requires the importer to give notice to the trade mark owner before any repackaged product is put on sale, and, on demand, supplies him with a specimen. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:12 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) King, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 376 (27 March 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC B1 (QB) (26 March 2012) Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd (t/a Medirest) v Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 781 (QB) (28 March 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) SMP Trustees Ltd, Re [2012] EWHC 772 (Ch) (27 March 2012) High Court (Family… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
No. 10-964-BMS (D. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:05 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:17 am
Palmettor Management Services, No. 3:05-cv-17-CMC-BM, 2006 WL 2623917 (D.S.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
Although it is perhaps plausible that the scope of the ’265 patent grant could have been broadened if the FTC failed to discover BMS’s nefarious conduct, such a hypothetical is irrelevant here – the FTC quickly discovered the existence of the oral agreement and BMS’s false certification prior to either the FTC or the state attorneys general giving approval to the May 2006 agreement.Apotex contends that our decision in Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm
(Oct. 6, 2009), available at http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/gbs_groupprivacy.pdf. 2 Authors Guild v. [read post]
