Search for: "Baker v. Wood" Results 61 - 80 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2016, 7:46 am by Alex R. McQuade
Before Apple responded in court, Andrew Woods commented on Apple’s possible arguments. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm by Elina Saxena
Following the agreement between Russia and the United States over the terms of a “cessation of hostilities” in Syria, the Syrian government and a major opposition group have said that “they will observe a conditional pause in fighting set to begin Saturday, but they also made clear that they expected the exercise to make little difference in the civil war. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:33 pm by Zosha Millman
Baker Hostetler’s Judy Selby writing from New York on the firm’s Copyright, Content, and Platforms Federal Regulatory Involvement in Marijuana – Seattle lawyer Robert McVay of Harris Moure writing on their Canna Law Blog The Apple Fight: Before Arguing About Privacy, Define Privacy – Charles Griffin Intelligence’s Philip Segal writing on their The Ethical Investigator 50 Years: Graham v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am by Alex R. McQuade
Alex Loomis provided a summary brief on Simon v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
” Andrew Keane Woods considered the increasing territorial control over the Internet asserted by states. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm by Elina Saxena
Fallout from Turkey’s shooting down of a Russian fighter jet last Tuesday continues. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Katfriend and occasional guest contributor Aaron Wood tells all.* Invalidating an absent litigant's trade marks: yes, of course it can be doneJeremy further reflects on Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:04 am
Today's DJ features GMSR's Alana Rotter in Lessons From Appeals of Nonappealable 'Judgments' about Baker v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]