Search for: "Barclay v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
Jesner v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
United States Fire Ins. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:28 pm
United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005) (“It is, of course, not wrongful for a manager to instruct his employees to comply with a valid document retention policy under ordinary circumstances. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:26 pm
In one recent year, more than 500,000 people in the United States fell victim to identity theft at the hands of friends and family. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:38 pm
Botticella, United States District Judge R. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am
Nevertheless, IOSCO members (like the United States) regulate 95 percent of the world’s securities markets. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:16 pm
" Â Brief of the United States of America Amicus Curiae Supporting Defendant-Appellees, at 21, Khulumani v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
” Barclay v United States, 443 F.3d 1368, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:30 am
Holdings Inc. v Barclays Bank PLC, 151AD3d108, 117 [1st Dept 2017], Iv to appeal denied, 29 NY3d 919 [2017] [internal quotations and citation omitted]). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:23 am
Here's an excerpt from the Berkman Center press release: The Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP), with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Public Citizen, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, urging the court to apply First Amendment scrutiny to the recently resurgent “hot news misappropriation” doctrine in Barclays Capital, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:23 am
Here's an excerpt from the Berkman Center press release: The Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP), with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Public Citizen, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, urging the court to apply First Amendment scrutiny to the recently resurgent “hot news misappropriation” doctrine in Barclays Capital, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Barclays Bank v O'Brien (1993) Sarah Greer66. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
GravesCase number: 11-cv-00176 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee)Case filed: April 15, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 1, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-107 SEC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:38 pm
Botticella, United States District Judge R. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
The Internet Cases Blog has published there articles covering significant recent cases in the United States: A summary judgment was recently awarded in favour of Chanel following the luxury brands challenge to the registrant of the domain name <chanelgraffitti.com>. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:42 am
The Court’s reasoning It was clear from the authorities (Abnett v British Airways Plc [1997] A.C. 430 and Barclay v British Airways Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 1419) that the Montreal Convention had exclusivity in domestic law. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
Recent Judgments The judgment of Warby J in the case of Barclay v Barclay [2020] EWHC 424 (QB) is now available on Bailii. [read post]
