Search for: "Barrett v. Hand"
Results 61 - 80
of 496
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:45 am
With Thomas and the Trump trio – Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett – this is the crew that struck down Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
One of the earliest of those cases, Atlas Roofing Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 7:35 pm
The more recent case, known as Garland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am
On the one hand, as James Madison powerfully said, the “accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
It is asking the Court to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1984 landmark decision in Chevron v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
If it gets out of hand, should Swift be criminally charged. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:56 pm
EPA, and—most recently—Biden v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In any event, Barrett made a policy decision to employ a heavy-handed interpretive tool that history simply does not supportIn the 2021-22 term, in Bruen and Dobbs, the conservative justices fell all over themselves to stress the importance of original public meaning to constitutional interpretation. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
” That’s why it was so significant that Justice Barrett authored a concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Moreover, when Judge Barrett was nominated to the Supreme Court, she had only a handful of high-profile cases. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Court then invoked its increasingly familiar “major questions doctrine” which, as the Court explained in West Virginia v. [read post]
