Search for: "Barrett v. People"
Results 61 - 80
of 844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2020, 4:24 pm
Bush v. [read post]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
The main event is another case, Dobbs v. [read post]
US Supreme Court rules that law criminalizing encouragement of illegal immigration is constitutional
24 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote about the dignity of same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am
By the time Indiana appealed its loss at the Seventh Circuit, SCOTUS would include Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and many court-watchers wondered whether the change to the bench would result in the Court’s eroding its landmark decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Biden v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm
The Constitution grants the President certain powers, privileges, and immunities, that regular people lack. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:56 am
The Biden win is Biden v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:43 pm
JUDGE BARRETT: Justice Holmes' famous dissent in Lochner, which was later the position adopted by the Court [in Williamson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Hockey Assoc., Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 10:00 am
Roberts In the Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:54 am
Despite this, the judges reflect very carefully on the outcomes for the people involved as well as the need to ensure the proper development of the law. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 11:42 am
Barrett et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am
Barrett, R (On the Application Of) v City of Westminster Council [2015] EWHC 2515 (Admin) We’re very late with this one for reasons which are no doubt entirely reasonable, but currently escape me. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
Barrett v LB Southwark [2008] EWHC 1568 (Comm) was an appeal of a dismissed application for permission to make a s.204 appeal out of time on an intentional homelessness decision upheld at s.202 review. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 9:19 pm
(Remember Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
This provision bars certain people who "engaged in insurrection" from serving in certain federal and state positions. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In dissent by himself, Justice Thomas did make originalist arguments but Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Alito did not join him.2021-2022:In Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 8:37 pm
The Biden v. [read post]