Search for: "Bates v. United States Department of Justice" Results 61 - 75 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
As shown below, the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”), which enforces Section 26820, applies the law to ban the display of any picture or physical depiction of a handgun. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
The Law Society said: “The secret justice proposals in the Justice and Security Bill must not become a cloak for a Government to hide its blushes nor be allowed to deny justice to deserving cases“. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Department of Commerce (nikkikalbing@gmail.com) The Future of Law in British Africa on the Eve of IndependenceRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School (oakande@sjd.law.harvard.edu) Marginalizing "Secularism," Decolonizing the State: Missionary Advocacy for Religious Freedom in British Colonial Northern Nigeria, 1945-1960Terence Mashingaidze, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe (mashingaidzet@staff.msu.ac.zw) Constitutionalism and Ritual Controversies in a… [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:53 am
But while European companies can breathe a little easier in the United States, there's increasing unease at home about the emergence of European equivalents to the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
Bates has written, “How is it that judicial approval is required when the United States decides to target a U.S. citizen overseas for electronic surveillance, but that, according to [the government], judicial scrutiny is prohibited when the United States decides to target a U.S. citizen overseas for death? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm by Lauren Bateman
Judge Pauley then describes the oversight of the program: “It is monitored by the Department of Justice, the Intelligence Community, the FISC, and Congress. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
  My goal here is to set out what I believe are the pros and cons, based on my prior personal experience as the senior legal official of the Department of Defense, a federal prosecutor, and as a career litigator. [read post]