Search for: "Batson v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
In order to determine whether a peremptory challenge is fair and legitimate, Maryland courts apply a three-step process established by the United States Supreme Court in the Batson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:02 pm
3 May 2008, 9:32 am
"United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:38 am
LouisianaDocket: 10-386Issue(s): Whether a court's modification of the three-step Batson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:44 am
The Court of Appeals does not agree, and the conviction stands.The case is United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 9:03 am
The United States Supreme Court issued a decision this morning in Snyder v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
Batson challenges to strikes related to Black Lives Matter support Decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1986, Batson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:10 am
United States, No. 14-8358. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
United States, a challenge by two Maine men to their convictions for possession of a firearm after a domestic violence conviction. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
It is estimated that 25,000 inmates in the United States are currently serving their sentence in whole or substantial part in solitary confinement, many regardless of their conduct in prison. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am
,United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Thus, there is no requirement that in the state court proceeding the petitioner cite the provisions of the United States Constitution which were violated. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:34 am
United States, Pugh v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:18 pm
See Burks v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:56 am
United States, respondent-appellees
U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:16 am
The case is a criminal one, State v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
United States as conferring constitutional status on the warnings and the associated exclusionary rule. [read post]
