Search for: "Baum v. Baum" Results 61 - 80 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
In this article, Fenwick & West discuss this dilemma and how to solve this patent law paradox. 5) The Truth About Hedy Lamarr - Written by Brandon Baum, of Baum Legal and Practice Center Contributor, this post shares the story of an early screen beauty turned co-inventor of a patent for an anti-jamming system for guiding torpedoes… sort of. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
In this article, Fenwick & West discuss this dilemma and how to solve this patent law paradox. 5) The Truth About Hedy Lamarr - Written by Brandon Baum, of Baum Legal and Practice Center Contributor, this post shares the story of an early screen beauty turned co-inventor of a patent for an anti-jamming system for guiding torpedoes… sort of. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:14 pm by Anna Christensen
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Webster v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lite failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession by, among other things, advising the plaintiffs to default in a lawsuit commenced against them in California and advising them that a default judgment obtained in California would not be enforceable in New York, a clearly incorrect statement of the law (see Logalbo v Plishkin, Rubano & Baum, 163 AD2d 511; Yiouti Rest. v Sotiriou, 151 AD2d at 745). [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 5:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum & Vitulli, 215 AD3d 699, 703). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Noel Canning, and use the original meaning as a regulative ideal doctrinally, as in Free Enterprise v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, the defendant's reliance upon the advice of the borrower's attorney reflects a failure to exercise ordinary reasonable skill (see Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 268 AD2d 578; McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592, 593; Logalbo v Plishkin, Rubano & Baum, 163 AD2d 511, 514). [read post]