Search for: "Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2017, 2:53 pm by Jim Gerl
New York City Dept of Educ 63 IDELR 181 (2d Cir 7/11/14) The Second Circuit held that the fact that the parent had not paid any money toward the $85,000 tuition owed to a private school did not prevent reimbursement. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:32 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:38 pm
So reads the headline to a New York Law Journal article about yesterday’s New York appellate court decision in Matter of Brito v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
I. v New York City Bd. of Educ., 256 AD2d 189; McDonald v Cook, 252 AD2d 302; and Lemp v Lewis, 226 AD2d 907, in support of its ruling. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
In addition, said the court, case law supported its conclusion that Jarema credit cannot be awarded to a regular substitute teacher who does not possess a valid New York State teacher's certificate. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Of Educ. of the City of New York, 40 NY2d 456, the Commissioner noted that the Court of Appeals has held that “[i]t is not enough to merely show ... that all guidance counseling positions have been eliminated.... [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:58 am by Phillips & Associates
The sex discrimination attorneys at Phillips & Associates advocate for New York City job applicants and employees in city, state, and federal legal claims. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:39 am
”As the current dispute depends on the interpretation of the CBA's no-layoff clause in order to determine whether that provision is applicable to the Village's action in abolishing six firefighters' positions, the court ruled that this was an issue that the parties agreed to submit to arbitration.Thus, said the court, Supreme Court properly determined that the parties' substantive disagreement as to the meaning and application of the no-layoff clause is to be resolved by… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
Bd. of Education of City of New York, No. 064715p.pdf "The question of whether a biological and non-custodial parent of a disabled child has standing to sue under the Individuals with Disabilities Act, is certified where plaintiff's standing turns on a question of New York law that has not been addressed by the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
New York City Bd of Educ 465 F.3d 503, 46 IDELR 181 (2d Cir. 10/12/2006), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was presented with the school district's argument that partial implementation of IEPs constituted the necessary "substantial compliance" required by IDEA. [read post]