Search for: "Best v. Clarke" Results 61 - 80 of 850
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by Michael Oykhman
Again, specific defences may only apply in certain cases and a lawyer will analyze and apply defences that are the best fit in each individual case. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:51 am by Eugene Volokh
In February, my UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic student Pauline Alarcon and I were appointed by District Judge Stephen Clark (E.D. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
MARLER of MARLER CLARK, LLP (pending admission pro hac vice), pursuant to MCR 2.118(A)(1), to allege and state as follows: I. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
How can we best ensure that any rules that we pursue can be easily and efficiently administered and that these rules do not rest on determinations that we are not well positioned to make or commitments that we are not well positioned to police? [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm by Frank Cranmer
 As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
The person most recently imprisoned for criminal contempt of Congress (as best I can tell) was Lloyd Barenblatt in 1959. [read post]