Search for: "Body v. McDonald" Results 61 - 80 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
’ In a statement, McDonald said “Mr Clarkson’s statement is highly defamatory and caused serious harm to my reputation. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am by Becky
McDonald’s has filed applications for McDONALD’s, MCCAFE, and its M Logo covering, among other things, “[v]irtual food and beverage products” in Class 9 and “[o]perating a virtual restaurant featuring actual food and beverages” in Class 43 (see here, here and here). 2. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm by INFORRM
As is clear from the concurring judgments of O’Farrell and McDonald JJ, it was not even necessary to engage in human rights analysis to find that the University had acted unreasonably in so doing. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:44 am
One had a gunshot wound to the head, and the other had bullet wounds to his body. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
Long may they continue.Missed opportunity of the year – McDonald’s v Supermac – This was a case deemed so unfortunate that it deserved a category of its own. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Emily Garcia Uhrig previews Wood v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, as the petitioners are now retireed, the School District does not have a statutory duty to bargain with them within the meaning of the Taylor Law, citing Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:38 pm by Tessa Shepperson
PRS Landlord groups consistently arguing that landlords are not public bodies and therefore not challengeable under human rights but cases such Manchester CC v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm by David Kopel
(Andrews, which struck down a ban on handgun carrying, was cited in Heller and McDonald. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:30 am by Amanda Rice
” Gans points not only to Scalia’s analysis of the Equal Protection Clause in Friday’s speech, but also to his analysis of the Privileges or Immunities Clause in McDonald v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
Sathe, while noting that the ‘high legitimacy of the [Indian] Supreme Court’ arises from its appearance as ‘a body aloof from politics’, acknowledged that several judges with prior parliamentary or ministerial experience (including V. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
Markham notes that, under the major questions doctrine, articulated last year by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
This partial incorporation is inconsistent both with prior Supreme Court practice and with McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:01 am by Guest Blogger
Adam WinklerOne important question raised by McDonald v. [read post]