Search for: "Body v. Taylor"
Results 61 - 80
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
The conventional understanding of the case is that it endorsed the existence of common law copyright, either directly or in combination with Millar v Taylor (KB 1769), while a revisionist account interprets the case as denying the existence of common law copyright. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 7:25 am
The Court considered the dictionary definitions of "clothes", which ordinarily applies to garments that cover the body, but not the head or feet. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 1:00 am
” (paragraph 31) The Supreme Court pointed to authority, Taylor v General Medical Council [1990] 2 AC 539, which was “unfortunately not cited” to the Extra Division. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
Richard Barbaro, a dentist, to testify as an expert in forensic dentistry about the bite marks on Taylor’s body. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
At trial, Johnson-Taylor stated that Zuniga's demeanor was hostile and his body language was threatening. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 39 NY3d 17, 22 [2022], quoting Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 39 NY3d 17, 22 [2022], quoting Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:57 pm
Smith, author of Hopwood v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:05 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Loving v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:28 am
In this note, occasional guest blogger Paul England (senior associate, Taylor Wessing, and definitely not a shark) gives us the low-down on a recent fairly economical patent dispute in which the only things inflated were the products made by the respective parties. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 3:42 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cantrell v Wycombe District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 866 (29 July 2008) Bailey v The Ministry of Defence & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 883 (29 July 2008) Blyth Valley Borough Council v Persimmon Homes (North East) Ltd & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 861 (29 July 2008) Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council v Bainbridge & Ors (”Bainbridge 1″) [2008] EWCA Civ 885 (29 July 2008) G, R (on the application… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm
Twitter * Section 230 Preempts Unfair Competition Law Claim–Taylor v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:47 am
Is there a clear and ambiguous disclosure in the application of PSBs asymmetric about the lateral axis of the caliper body? [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:12 pm
Consider then, the alleged infringing "Bodyfat Analyzer and Scale" products in the recent suit, Tanita Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:00 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, as the petitioners are now retireed, the School District does not have a statutory duty to bargain with them within the meaning of the Taylor Law, citing Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm
In the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case Frontiero v. [read post]
