Search for: "Booker v. Thomas"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:39 am
Gore or last month's Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
Since Oregon v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:01 am
No, explains Judge Thomas in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:38 am
Washington (Apprendi, Booker, etc) -- criminal practitioners rejoiced when Scalia started the revolt against the mandatory federal sentencing guidelines. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:30 pm
The first was Arizona v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 10:35 pm
Patane, 542 U.S. 630 (2004), in a decision written by Justice Thomas, held that the failure of law enforcement officials to give a suspect warnings pursuant to Miranda v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:29 am
Call Thomas Withers in Savannah (912) 447-8400 or Craig Gillen in Atlanta (404) 842-9700. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 1:52 pm
See: Koon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:03 pm
Oregon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
In a forceful dissent, Justice Scalia, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Souter and Thomas, argued that "Oregon’s sentencing scheme allows judges rather than juries to find the facts necessary to commit defendants to longer prison sentences, and thus directly contradicts what we held eight years ago and have reaffirmed several times since. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
The Virginia Supreme Court acknowledges the latter view in Thomas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 3:35 pm
In separate opinions in recent years, Justice Stevens has suggested that he might like to overrule the Harris decision allowing judges to find facts triggering mandatory minimum sentence, and Justices Scalia and Thomas have indicated in various ways their concerns about the preservation of Sixth Amendment principles in the application of the Booker remedy. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
US, No. 07-2709 Denial of a motion for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 from a conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute controlled substances is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) defendant was denied conflict-free counsel; and 2) Booker applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Booker Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0482n.06 Bash v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
[iii] Thomas B. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:46 am
In his concurring opinion, Justice Thomas reiterated - as he did in his Kimbrough dissent earlier this term - that there is no principled way to apply the Booker remedy, and thus that the Guidelines should be mandatory. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
And Justice Alito's silence in this case is an especially notable component of the division among Justice still fighting over the Booker's meaning and impact (including Justice Thomas, who write again to attack the Booker remedy). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
by Collin, Dallas and Denton County DWI Attorney Troy Burleson If you have been charged with a Collin, Dallas or Denton county DWI, chances are you were asked to do field tests by the officer who arrested you. [read post]
