Search for: "Botts v. United States" Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Here is Kim’s guest post:    This week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Erica P. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:28 am
Int'l Trade Comm'n changed the accepted wisdom regarding the commission's power to issue broad injunctive relief excluding infringing articles from importation into the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
The firm has also recruited a local United Arab Emirates-qualified associate. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Serving as Chief Justice of the United States was Duke Law School Dean, and former Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:00 pm
Wald,former Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the D.C.Circuit, and former Judge for the International Criminal Tribunal (Associate Justice) Glen D. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am by David G. Badertscher
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am
It was largely thanks to Freedom Now that Yang was able to leave a Chinese prison earlier this year and to return to the United States on Saturday as a free man. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court has held that Morrison v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
United States that "use" requires "active employment" of the firearm against 1993's SOC holding in Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Quest Recovery Services, Inc., 06-263 The Court GVR'd this ADA case to the 6th Circuit so that it could consider both the views of the United States as intervenor and the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Sea Star Line, LLC, 06-606 QP: "Whether the Carmack Amendment applies to the inland leg of a multimodal shipment to a place in the United States from a place in a territory of the United States even if the inland carrier does not issue a separate bill of lading for the inland leg. [read post]